INDEX
   
2 Editor's Comment
... ..................................................
3 The Geopolitics of Defence...
... ..................................................
4 Paris air Show Reviewed by DefenceIntegration.org
... ..................................................
8 EADS Driving Technology
Integration in a Global
Security Environment...
... ..................................................
12 BAE Systems Develop an Efficient RF Cable Test Suite
for the Eurofighter Aircraft...
... ..................................................
14 Heavy duty lessons...
... ..................................................
17 Autosport Trade Show Offers Golden Opportunity to Expand
... ..................................................
19 New military Vehicles Debuted at DVD 2007
... ..................................................
20 TRW Conekt Rises To The MoD’s ‘Grand Challenge’...
... ..................................................
22 MIRA AV Unmanned Land Vehicle Rise of the Machines
... ..................................................
24 Inflatable technology from the
Romans to the present...
... ..................................................
27 Visioneering Forms Strategic
Partnership With United
Aerospace...
... ..................................................
29 BAE Steps Up Interest in Talisman Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) from Altanet...
... ..................................................
32 Eastbourne Air Show Review...
... ..................................................
34 Defence Integration.Org
Visits Indian Space
Research Organization...
... ..................................................
36 Raytheon's Military and Civil Defence reviewed by Defence Integration.org
... ..................................................
37 SAE International Hybrid Engine Course in the UK at Technium, home of Connaught Hybrids...
... ..................................................
39 DVD Millbrook Event sets a
new standard in the representation of military
vehicles..
.
... ..................................................
42 DefenceIntegration.org Interviews TCS
... ..................................................
44 National Instruments Automotive Solutions Conference...
   
 
 
 
to start the engine, run off the electric motor, or both. In the recent years, MIRA went further by offering semi-autonomous vehicles; ones where the vehicle’s maximum speed on the highway was governed by the car not the driver …but all this is falls some way short of George Lucas and Star Wars! Thankfully MIRA have been pushing the capabilities of ground based autonomous vehicles far beyond these commonplace features.
   
requirements. This unit directly interfaces with the primary vehicle controls, such as steering and drive. This unit is programmed to deliver platform specific signals and understands the platform’s unique dynamic characteristics. It screens out commands from the high level unit which may adversely affect stability or safety. In contrast to the high level module, this unit is highly specific to the
 
 

So what do we really mean by an autonomous vehicle? A sensible definition would be: “A fully autonomous vehicle is one that does not necessarily require human involvement to make a decision.” But as we can see from all the foregoing, there are varying degrees of autonomy. It is perhaps more useful to focus on a particular application, to examine the state of the art - and then consider where all this is taking us.

One of MIRA’s unclassified projects goes by the snappy title: Mira Autonomous Control Engineering, or “MACE” for short. MACE is high-endurance, fully autonomous, all-terrain platform. It boasts a rugged 4 wheel drive, 4 wheel steer chassis, with a series hybrid powertrain that can carry (and power) a 300Kg payload. This versatile AV is designed primarily to be used for the kind of reconnaissance missions identified by the MOD in the forthcoming “Grand Challenge” – Lord Grayson’s high-profile head to head competition for AV’s with the finals to be held at Copehill Down in 2008. The Grand Challenge aims to produce an autonomous or semi-autonomous technology system designed to "detect, identify, monitor and report a comprehensive range of physical threats in a complex urban environment". The kind of autonomous control and threat detection capability MACE is loaded with to succeed in this sort of task genuinely represents the current state of the art. Aside from the primary speed and directional control systems that each offer fine degrees of fidelity, MACE avoids major obstacles via a laser sensing system. Mission planning capabilities are broken down into 2 main areas, namely patrol and scouting. Whilst ‘scouting’ the terrain classification function allows MACE to relay both topological features and more changeable attributes such as the condition of the ground (hard/easy going) back to mission commanders …vital information that it is not possible to recover reliably from aerial surveillance.

MACE’s intelligent power management system is aware of the energy required to travel from A to B, and it projects the amount of energy required to perform the task. It later compares the actual energy used with its own projections. This information can then be communicated to other similar machines for local tactical benefits. In addition to scouting missions, MACE can be set the objective to patrol an area. This area may be broken into areas of high and low risk, with waypoints overlaid for the vehicle to try and cover, if conditions allow. In high risk locations where quiet operation is desirable, MACE can switch off the IC engine to ensure its position is not easily revealed. It will plan an effective route considering all the permutations including: the state of the ground, any desirable waypoints, the energy required to complete the route and the impact any quiet running has on battery state of charge. The rules of the Grand Challenge require that vehicles investigate an urban environment and look for snipers, mines and IED’s. This drives the requirement for MACE to be able to adapt its route on-the-fly to interrogate ‘interesting’ signals from its senor array.

How is autonomous control achieved? On a practical level, the autonomous control tends to be subdivided into 3 main modules, illustrated in the diagram. The high level module, with all the high-end features such as mission planning, obstacle avoidance and route following capabilities can be a fairly generic unit which could be applied to a range of vehicles, not merely land class vehicles. At the otherend of the system there is a module which understands the vehicles own hardware

 
make and model of the vehicle/plane/boat it is controlling. Between these two units sits a third module, whose role is to provide appropriate communication and calibration signals between the units upstream and downstream. By compartmentalising the autonomous functions in this way the core technology is easily transferable between different vehicles with distinct dynamic properties and control architectures.

MIRA’s strategy for achieving this high degree of autonomy is quite novel. MIRA advocate physically separating the vehicle control modules between the vehicle platform and a separate base station. This suggestion can on occasion engender a feeling of dissatisfaction with casual observers. They often to ask “why can’t you get the mobile platform to work on its own”, or “that sounds a little like remote control, or something …isn’t that cheating?” The truth is that it is entirely possible to consolidate all the hardware and software required to achieve full autonomous control into the vehicle platform, so the reason is not a technical one. MIRA’s rationale for splitting the autonomous control system is to maintain relatively high value components in a base station (or master platform) which is kept out of danger. The mobile AV platform then becomes a cheaper and more expendable item. For the MACE application operators can, if they want, track and prescribe objectives for the vehicle from the base station, although they are not necessarily required to do so.

MIRA’s strategy does not prescribe that the ‘base station’ has to be planted to the ground. It is entirely feasible to use an AV as a mobile ‘base station’ or ‘master platform’ that is used in the control of simpler AV’s, working as a local pack. Again the master platform would tend to keep a safe distance from danger, whilst the cheaper drones are free to embark on more risky tasks. So MIRA’s intelligent use of distributed autonomous control, where higher value assets are positioned in lower risk settings, ensures cost-effective and reliable autonomy.

From a communications perspective there is a marked contrast between remotely controlled unmanned vehicles and autonomous vehicles. An autonomous pack can operate effectively at great distance from its mission commanders, as it doesn’t have to contend with the inescapable issue of communications delay. Moreover, we live in an imperfect world and extreme distance isn’t the only cause of significant communications ‘delay’. An extended ‘delay’ in the form of long distance comms disruption could create havoc in theatre for remotely controlled devices; yet autonomous vehicles would continue to operate whilst global comms are re-established.

As we went to press MIRA’s entry into the “MOD Grand Challenge” was confirmed. This announcement has ensured their engineers will continue to focus and further develop autonomous technology to meet the challenges of modern combat. Does this signal the rise of the machines ?

 

 
 
Site Designed at: Versatile Solutions
Home Read DI Online Advertise with us Our Media Partners
Contact us Sitemap